<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One Card For Three People</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beastpieces.com/2009/04/one-card-for-three-people/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.beastpieces.com/2009/04/one-card-for-three-people/</link>
	<description>Studio On Fire // Design &#38; Letterpress Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:54:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cameron</title>
		<link>http://www.beastpieces.com/2009/04/one-card-for-three-people/comment-page-1/#comment-1352</link>
		<dc:creator>Cameron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 22:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beastpieces.com/?p=1093#comment-1352</guid>
		<description>Hi there – very nice!
Out of interest which typeface is that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there – very nice!<br />
Out of interest which typeface is that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StudioOnFire</title>
		<link>http://www.beastpieces.com/2009/04/one-card-for-three-people/comment-page-1/#comment-869</link>
		<dc:creator>StudioOnFire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 20:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beastpieces.com/?p=1093#comment-869</guid>
		<description>We double pass projects often, and it certainly is more cost effective at times then battling a job, trying to hit it in a single pass. However, the inking system and the impressional strength on a 10x15 is not as robust and we&#039;d like. We struggle even with a rider roller on the 10x15 to eliminate mechanical ghosting altogether. A 13x18, especially with rider rollers just handles the ink better. There are three form rollers and two riders, plus even more rollers in the ink train. The down side is that the 13x18 is a beast and a bit touchy. In the press room, once you switch back over to the 10x15 you feel like you are running a race car.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We double pass projects often, and it certainly is more cost effective at times then battling a job, trying to hit it in a single pass. However, the inking system and the impressional strength on a 10&#215;15 is not as robust and we&#8217;d like. We struggle even with a rider roller on the 10&#215;15 to eliminate mechanical ghosting altogether. A 13&#215;18, especially with rider rollers just handles the ink better. There are three form rollers and two riders, plus even more rollers in the ink train. The down side is that the 13&#215;18 is a beast and a bit touchy. In the press room, once you switch back over to the 10&#215;15 you feel like you are running a race car.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gemorris</title>
		<link>http://www.beastpieces.com/2009/04/one-card-for-three-people/comment-page-1/#comment-868</link>
		<dc:creator>gemorris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 19:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beastpieces.com/?p=1093#comment-868</guid>
		<description>My solution usually is to simply double impress to get better coverage on the 10x15.  My 13x18 is foil/die only.  I&#039;m guessing for a job shop (even a specialized one) double impression isn&#039;t a cost effective option?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My solution usually is to simply double impress to get better coverage on the 10&#215;15.  My 13&#215;18 is foil/die only.  I&#8217;m guessing for a job shop (even a specialized one) double impression isn&#8217;t a cost effective option?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

